-
ekp We pay people a per assignment fee. I think it can also go the other way, where people value time more than money, and push work onto candidates who are unlikely to be successful.
-
ekp I mean, I know it can go the other way because I’ve seen it. IMO problem with most hiring processes is that too much time is spent on unqualified (white) men. Shifting the process so that time spent on people is proportional to success leads to better candidate exp and outcomes.
-
ekp And I think results in more diverse teams overall. When fixing a hiring process top of the funnel clarification (JD) & calibration are huge levers. The money goes well with that when you use it to communicate to candidates that you value their time. I vastly prefer the flat fee.