catehstn’s avatarcatehstn’s Twitter Archive—№ 32,749

              1. For research purposes I'm finally reading that drivel apologia about lambda conf and this jumped out "Some attendees are amoral atheists".
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites Mood 0
            1. …in reply to @catehstn
              Like wtf, I'm pretty quiet about being atheist because so many threw out the books and kept the raging misogyny, but what the actual fuck.
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ❤️ 14 Favorites Mood -5 🙁
          1. …in reply to @catehstn
            Which reminds me of how many times I've heard that cocoa conf is fine w/o a CoC because the founders are so religious - specifically xtian.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ❤️ 4 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
        1. …in reply to @catehstn
          There's so many problems with that, not least of which is the racism inherent in xtian good and other religions likely terrorist.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood -4 🙁
      1. …in reply to @catehstn
        But I'm gonna end with this: religion doesn't mean shit when it comes to morality. In any direction.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 18 Favorites Mood -4 🙁
    1. …in reply to @catehstn
      Still reading this post. IDK why. Really it's an illustration of why "diversity of thought" as a phrase makes me want to stab people.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 11 Favorites Mood -1 🙁
  1. …in reply to @catehstn
    A more accurate phrase might be "diversity of critical thinking", "diversity of respect for humanity", "diversity of awareness of history".
    On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 15 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
    1. …in reply to @catehstn
      I cannot with this "there are two sides" to the argument thing. Like a wall has two sides, but maybe one side is covered in nails?
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ❤️ 11 Favorites Mood +2 🙂
      1. …in reply to @catehstn
        Or like "well both sides got hurt", what if someone punched you in the face and then fell over his own shoelaces? You both got hurt. Right?
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
        1. …in reply to @catehstn
          I got to the end. One more point: the focus is on "safety" and not on "welcoming". It's about plausible deniability rather than inclusivity.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 11 Favorites Mood +1 🙂
          1. …in reply to @catehstn
            I will tell you that a lot of conferences out there are aiming higher than safety, they are aiming for welcome, for real inclusion.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 6 Favorites Mood +3 🙂
            1. …in reply to @catehstn
              If safety is enough for you then cool. If you want something more, then there are so many events that would be lucky to have you there.
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +6 🙂
              1. …in reply to @catehstn
                And if you're a speaker thinking about pulling out, my DMs are open - if you think I can help you, get in touch, I will if I can.
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo catehstn’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets Mood +2 🙂